Washington Monthly Calls For The Return of the Draft


The Washington Monthly has a major essay titled “The Case for the Draft” in its new issue calling for the return of a military draft and mandating all college-bound students serve the country (not necessarily in a military capacity) for a year before starting college.

The co-authors of the article, Phillip Carter and Paul Glastris, write: “America has a choice. It can be the world’s superpower, or it can maintain the current all-volunteer military, but it probably can’t do both.” (Glastis is the editor in chief of the magazine.)

The authors go on to describe their vision of a 21st century draft:

“Instead of a lottery, the federal government would impose a requirement that no four-year college or university be allowed to accept a student, male or female, unless and until that student had completed a 12-month to two-year term of service. Unlike an old-fashioned draft, this 21st-century service requirement would provide a vital element of personal choice. Students could choose to fulfill their obligations in any of three ways: in national service programs like AmeriCorps (tutoring disadvantaged children), in homeland security assignments (guarding ports), or in the military. Those who chose the latter could serve as military police officers, truck drivers, or other non-combat specialists requiring only modest levels of training. (It should be noted that the Army currently offers two-year enlistments for all of these jobs, as well as for the infantry.) They would be deployed as needed for peacekeeping or nation-building missions. They would serve for 12-months to two years, with modest follow-on reserve obligations. 

“Whichever option they choose, all who serve would receive modest stipends and GI Bill-type college grants. Those who sign up for lengthier and riskier duty, however, would receive higher pay and larger college grants. Most would no doubt pick the less dangerous options. But some would certainly select the military—out of patriotism, a sense of adventure, or to test their mettle. Even if only 10 percent of the one-million young people who annually start at four-year colleges and universities were to choose the military option, the armed forces would receive 100,000 fresh recruits every year. These would be motivated recruits, having chosen the military over other, less demanding forms of service. And because they would all be college-grade and college-bound, they would have—to a greater extent than your average volunteer recruit—the savvy and inclination to pick up foreign languages and other skills that are often the key to effective peacekeeping work. 

“A 21st-century draft like this would create a cascading series of benefits for society. It would instill a new ethic of service in that sector of society, the college-bound, most likely to reap the fruits of American prosperity. It would mobilize an army of young people for vital domestic missions, such as helping a growing population of seniors who want to avoid nursing homes but need help with simple daily tasks like grocery shopping. It would give more of America’s elite an experience of the military. Above all, it would provide the all-important surge capacity now missing from our force structure, insuring that the military would never again lack for manpower. And it would do all this without requiring any American to carry a gun who did not choose to do so.

“If America wishes to retain its mantle of global leadership, it must develop a military force structure capable of persevering under these circumstances. Fortunately, we know how to build such a force. We have done it many times in the past. The question is: Do we have the will to do so again?”


4 Responses to “Washington Monthly Calls For The Return of the Draft”

  1. Ghost Says:

    Unfortunately, one and two year service obligations would not even afford enough time for the basic skills training needed to perform the more complex military skills.

    Show me a one or two year draftee, and I’ll show you someone who will be incapable of doing intermediate level maintenance on advanced avionics systems. In fact, the Navy’s basic Aviation Electrician School is roughly 6 months long. Add on 3 months for basic training and now we’re talking about 3-15 months of effective duty for a 9 month minimum training investment. I’m afraid that simply doesn’t make sense.

    When taken with the numerous other reasons why a draft is idiotic, it begs the question: Why would anyone want a draft? Furthermore, why are all the draft proposals coming from draft opponents?

  2. Leslie Says:

    The army at this time is offering a 15 month special contract to folks who sign up. It doesn’t seem to make much sense at first, and then you factor in the military stop-loss policies.
    You sucker someone in for a short 15-month contract, and then when they are stationed wherever they happen to be, they are required to stay for as long as their unit stays which could be a few more days, or even a year by some reports.
    It makes a whole lot of sense to me, not to mention the fact that anyone who signs up is still on the reserve list for about 8 years after their contract has expired. Insidious what?

  3. Dave Davis Says:

    The contract is eight years total. For example, that could mean three years active duty, and the rest in the inactive ready reserves; or three years active, three years reserve, and the last two in the inactive ready reserves.
    Finally, the recruiter did NOT put a gun to my head and make me sign up when I joined the military.

  4. John Martin Says:

    Wasn’t there a recent ruling by the Supreme Court concerning the soldier who filed a breach of contract suit with the Army. The court ruled that the stop-loss policy in question was legal and the soldier (and all military personnel) are now legally required to follow this rule for as much as 20 years beyond the end of their contract and can be redeployed at any time throughout this period (which is exactly what happend to this soldier).
    I doubt if the recruiters are mentioning that one in their spiel.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: