Army Strong or Army Wrong?



Last October the Army changed its slogan from “An Army of One” to “Army Strong,” spending millions of dollars to create and promote the new recruitment campaign.

In its battle to win the hearts and minds of recruiting-age Americans, the Army is replacing its main ad slogan — “An Army of One” — with one it hopes will pack more punch: “Army Strong.”

The new approach, the fruit of a $200 million-a-year contract with a major advertising agency, was announced Monday by Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey. He said “Army Strong” will be the centerpiece of a multimedia ad campaign to be launched Nov. 9, timed to coincide with Veterans Day weekend.

Army officials acknowledge that recruiting during wartime is difficult, particularly with the Iraq war grinding on far longer than Bush administration officials expected and U.S. troops dying in battle almost every day.

“There’s no question that we want to have a marketing boost right now, it’s important to us,” said Lt. Gen. Robert L. Van Antwerp, who oversees the recruiting effort as commander of U.S. Army Accessions Command.

An anonymous psychological operations specialist at Fort Bragg told the Fayetteville Observer, “Army Strong is a weak attempt to recruit,” said a psychological operations specialist from Fort Bragg who asked that his name not be used. “‘An Army of One’ was bad and ‘Army Strong’ is just as bad. They spent too much money on it, money that could have been spent on people who are already being strong.”

In a January 29 story, the USA Today took a closer look at the Army’s latest marketing efforts (I added in the links):

Details on the tactics it’s using:

Story-telling streaming video. now has video profiles of 10 soldiers. Users can click on the soldiers’ images, which include a Blackhawk pilot and a sniper, to hear his or her personal story.

Interactive profile. The profile has emotional “Army Strong” themed videos, photos that show real overseas soldiers, and a button to download the Army’s online video game, America’s Army.

•Revving up one-on-one recruiting. Interested recruits can send instant messages to virtual recruiter “Sgt. Star,” who has built-in answers to frequently asked questions. The Army also has chat rooms with real recruiters.

There are also marketing messages targeted to “influencers” such as parents or school counselors. Parents, in particular, “can be the barrier” to recruitment, says Markus.

“A kid will get to a recruiting station, and they’ll go home, and a parent will say, ‘over my dead body,’ because of the state of things,” he says. “We had to educate them about the kind of strength their child is going to attain when they become a soldier in the U.S. Army.”

While Markus acknowledges, “It’s not a popular war,” the ads were “liked a lot” or “liked somewhat” by more than half of those polled for USA TODAY’s weekly Ad Track survey. However, the 17% who liked the ads a lot fell under the Ad Track survey average for that response, which is 21%.


“I don’t think you can deny what’s going on in the world,” says Markus. “The only way to deal with that is to be as truthful as possible.”

Both spokesmen for the Army quoted in these articles claimed that despite the massive spending on marketing, military recruiters are still upfront about the harsh reality of military service. Lt. Gen. Van Antwerp, who oversees the Army’s recuiting efforts, told the AP in the first article referred to above that “every recruiter will tell you, there is a very strong likelihood that you’re going to deploy.” That’s funny because barely a month after the Army introduced the new slogan, some undercover work by ABC-7 in New York found that a sample of military recruiters, across the board, were being anything but honest with students posing as potential recruits.

It appears some Army recruiters are willing to say just about anything to reel-in a new soldier.

Student: “Will I be going to war?”
Recruiter: “I would say your chances would be slim to none …”

We sent students undercover to ten Army recruiting offices throughout the Tri-State area.

Recruiter: “We almost welcome being shot at because it helps us identify where they are shooting from …”

Some recruiters were up front about the dangers of enlisting.

Stamford recruiter: “Every job in the Army does include combat. Plain and simple.”

But nearly half of the recruiters who talked to our undercover students compared everyday risks here at home to being in Iraq.

Elizabeth recruiter: “I like Subway sandwiches and salads. I watched the news yesterday, a guy got killed at Subway.”

Patchogue recruiter: “You have a 10-times greater chance of dying out here on the roads than you do dying in Iraq.”

Mt. Vernon recruiter: “I’d rather be hit by a car instead of getting hit by a bomb, what’s the difference. Your not living, your dead. That sucker is gone it’s a wrap.”

The article goes on to list even more ridiculous quotes from military recruiters.

Texans for Peace has launched as a counter to the new slogan. There are parts of the site that don’t appear to be finished, but it looks like a good resource for counter-recruiters. While it may not be the product of millions of dollars of marketing research, it does highlight a different side of the Army:

ArmyWrong is a new front in an escalating insurgency to counter the $200 million per year the Army spends on campaigns squarely aimed at the youth of America–packed with images of power and hyped across the full media spectrum.

This nationwide effort, led by Texans for Peace, battles growing militarism while also pointing out how today’s military-industrial complex “perverts the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, Justice and Liberty,” says Charlie Jackson, ArmyWrong creator.

In the tradition of Vietnam-era satire, ArmyWrong turns military slogans on their face. “There’s Wrong and There’s Army Wrong” is the motto of the new campaign. The project’s website and materials heap payloads of satire and humor on military issues ranging from daily army life to the lack of volunteers from neoconservative groups.

But make no mistake, counter-recruiting efforts like ArmyWrrong are hoping to do something more serious … obstruct the creeping militarism of America and war policies by encouraging youth to find other forms of service.

“There’s strong and then there’s Army Strong. The strength to do good today.
The strength to do well tomorrow. There is nothing on this green earth that
is stronger than the U.S. Army,” the Army’s new slogan announces.

“Wrong”, say faith communities, schools and educators, active and retired military, and peace organizations. There are many things stronger they remind Americans; trust, integrity, kindness, friendship, and love, to name but a few. These groups, working together, will be using ArmyWrong to take command of high ground dialogues with the nation’s youth and their families.

What do you think about the Army’s slogan? How should counter-recruiters respond? Comments are welcome.


9 Responses to “Army Strong or Army Wrong?”

  1. JOBMATCHBOX » Blog Archive » Anti-Recruitment? Says:

    […] of their posts are closely related to topics that have been covered here on Jobmatchbox including recruitment using Social Networks and Video Sites like MySpace and YouTube, the use of video games, and at least one area we haven’t covered: tv ads used for […]

  2. SgtJon Says:

    … and then there’s ARMY WRONG!

    see , an entirely different look at the military.

  3. Marines lie. « Kateostrophic. Says:

    […] Yes, they pay for your college, sometimes. Is that really what we are about people? We have people in this country that will sell out to the US army so they can go to college? I would rather be paying back debts the rest of my life than participate in the heinous crimes of this country. Read people.  […]

  4. Lt. Dave Says:

    Vets are the least known minority in history.

    For example
    1. when President Hoover ordered the Army to open fire on world war i veterans protesting their discrimination killing 3,000 of them on the capitol lawn.

    2. After world war ii and korea most vets were denied disability compensation without cause that included paralyzed vets.

    3. After Vietnam vets were denied payment for injuries for no reason, called baby killers, murdered, spit on, denied college admission, and discriminated against when applying for a job.

    4. Now vets have been killed at bus stops for being war vets, denied employment based veteran status, stop lossed past their contract period, forced to serve with injuries such as missing limbs, and stone walled by the VA when they try to get help.

    Let me give you my story I was in the for Army 7 years, and was forced to stay in with a bad lung disease and prosthetic leg. After that I decided to not stay in because my units keeping me in was a wink and nod with medical any way causing me allot of pain. This was common as every unit has 4 to 12 people who technically should be out. The after effect was a war that my unit played to keep me in as I come from a very small high demand MOS

    After my chain of command exhausted all threats to make me reenlist including a fake criminal case that was laughed out by JAG they tried to differ my remaining 11 months in IRR to active and then stop loss me to keep me in. My secret weapon was 68 days of leave to throw off their time table with HRC but my commander denied my leave 3 times without reason. My operations sergeant channeled it to brigade and it got approved. Note there were 30 people in my company and my commander was a O-5.

    When I got out the Army liaison tried to alter my medical records and they tried to say I had the leg clearly I did not have. I finally called both my senator and congressman and they found out the Army liaison had arranged to send my claim to Salt Lake City. Another scandle soon after broke and with my real records in hand caused them to back off.

    When I tried to get a job I was turned away even though I have 7 years Army experience, experience 5 years corporate experience, a MBA, and Honorable discharge with a RE code of 1 I was looked at like a child molester.

    Why would they do this?

  5. clair Says:

    stoppppppppppppp ttttttttttthhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeee wwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    i dont like poeple who like wars:D

  6. Building Links Says:

    Building Links…

    […]Army Strong or Army Wrong? «[…]…

  7. i peed a little - so funny you might wet your pants Says:

    i peed a little – so funny you might wet your pants…

    […]Army Strong or Army Wrong? «[…]…

  8. Drew Gasaway Says:

    Lt. Dave and I have a very close story. I can tell you this soldiers are great people but the brass, public affairs, HRC and their kin are dirty crooks. They did the same altering my records and trying to use force to make me stay in. I also should have been medically discharged. The army will abuse you and always tell fairy tales. Why do you think they have public affairs? To lie out their ass.

  9. Says:

    You’re so interesting! I don’t suppose I have read through anything like
    that before. So great to discover another person with some unique thoughts on
    this topic. Really.. many thanks for starting this up.
    This site is one thing that is required on the internet, someone with some originality!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: